Painting as a Meditation on the Self and the Universe
Dreaming is the Hard Part, Believe it or Not
"I dream a lot. I do more painting when I'm not painting. It's in the subconscious."
-Andrew Wyeth
I find this quip from Wyeth to be very true for me in the sense that when I'm painting there is that inherent bliss in the work. The continuity of the project, the brush to the paper, the dipping in water, the flow of the paint, finishing the line, seeing the form, finishing the next part etc.
When I'm not painting (or engaging in other hobbies/distractions) it's like my mind is constantly churning. I mean the action of the painting, can be considered the final part of the process. Everything I see, hear, etc. I am automatically influenced by, and the mind is constantly taking in and thinking, thinking, thinking; always thinking. It's hard to shut the damn thing off sometimes.
Even as a kid age seven or eight maybe, I remember thinking about my mind as being similar to some sort of separate muscle that moved on its own without my intending it too. I found it frustrating. Almost like it could process information faster than my conscious mind could work through. I guess that is what dreams are for. I have always been much more of a visual learner, then anything else. It took me a long time to start talking, but I always remember being comfortable drawing pictures.
So about dreaming specifically, it's an important part of my creative process. Dreaming can be like painting in the sense that you're working out aspects (trying to express and understand) of your daily life, inner fears, desires, emotions; through elements like visual symbols and various imagery, colors, and settings. Sometimes I'll get an idea for a painting from a dream and sometimes I will create a painting and then dream about the elements from it. Both are things that help me understand myself better.
Anyways that is my thought for the day (well one at least). Just another attempt at understanding the creative process.
Where's the Line and How do I Cross It?
There are millions of us in this world who say well I am really a writer or I am working here, but I really am a painter. That last leg of the journey to doing your art full time requires a lot of risk taking, and sometimes it seems like I don't even know how to approach that risk. Well the first step obviously is creating the work, and the best way to do that is in solitude, found in the time necessary to be free and do the work.
"To dream magnificently is not a gift given to all men, and even for those who possess it, it runs a strong risk of being progressively diminished by the ever-growing dissipation of modern life and by the restlessness engendered by material progress. The ability to dream is a divine and mysterious ability; because it is through dreams that man communicates with the shadowy world which surrounds him. But this power needs solitude to develop freely; the more one concentrates, the more one is likely to dream fully, deeply."
-Charles Baudelaire
You always hear the stories of great artists and writers, musicians, etc. who were born into a comfortable life, whose fathers and mothers taught them their art from the time they were born, and introduced them to all the proper connections their whole life. That is often the story when you read the biography of famous artists of the past. How many people who are given the gift of being able to dream deeply, are allowed the time and the effort needed to truly use this gift?
Working full-time or part-time even at a job that's not ideal because one has bills to pay and of course being tired after the day is done can seem as I said before, like an endless cycle. Maybe you get a little work done doing what you truly love to do, but I also imagine what I could do with a fully laid out wide open studio and lots of time (who doesn't though right?).
Speaking specifically though about Baudelaire's words above and dreaming.... One summer a number of years ago I did have the luxury of time, freedom and the concentration to write my dreams down every day. Where at first it seemed like a lot of random crazy objects, people, and events; after a few weeks a pattern emerged. Like filling in a puzzle that you don't have the whole picture to yet but eventually it starts to make sense. I am well on way in this journey of filling out that puzzle that is my art, with a bit of luck maybe eventually I'll be able to fill it in and complete the whole picture, or at least start to get some major holes filled in!
Working At Being an Artist
Let's talk about creative inspiration. A common idea in talk of and by artist's, writers, musicians, etc., is that notion that creativity comes in spurts, that you must get on a roll, ride the wave, get in the flow or whatever; you know what I mean. But does that have to be the case? I say no, not at all. Although my lack of writing this month I attribute to being uninspired, maybe I am just being lazy. Aren't successful artists the ones who are at least somewhat regimented with a discipline of creating every single day for at least several hours if not 8-10 hours or more (ideally)?
"Why do people think artists are special? It's just another job."
Andy Warhol (1928-87)
Warhol is right on with this quote, at least for me, - painting and drawing is not all bliss and vision and inspiration. I do believe that there is a kind of creative cycle or tide that comes in and leaves, absolutely, it's hard to deny that. But what about continuing to create when the inspirational tide goes out to sea again? Sometimes I don't feel like even looking at paper or pencils, paints, computers or anything, but to be successful one must get past this right? We create because we are passionate about the work obviously, and you don't want to force anything, but at the same time I definitely could more disciplined in my creative endeavors.
Maybe the key is changing things up when you feel that block. When I'm not painting I could be photographing, then publishing and writing online, then networking, and when the tide comes back in I'm ready to paint. By focusing on different aspects involved in being an artist maybe it's possible to kind of cycle those processes into working on something every day.
Painting As a Process of Discovery
"Painting is not for me either decorative amusement, or the plastic invention of felt reality; it must be every time: invention, discovery, revelation." - Max Ernst
I make the mistake of forgetting this idea on a regular basis. One would think it would be easy to maintain this aspect when painting and drawing, but it is not so easy for me. The best moments are of course when I am in the moment, creating. Giving life to something completely new, something vibrant, expressive, unique; lost in that moment of expression.
The farther I can get lost in it, the more truly expressive the work can become. But reaching that point requires letting go all of those things that can keep me from getting to the ideas that Ernst expresses in the preceding quote. I mean avoiding things like too much repetition or too much concern with the final product. The latter happens to me a lot when I am working on a painting or drawing. I start with just a free kind of attitude of having fun just putting paint to canvas or ink to paper and I am really liking what I am doing. Then the more I think I like it the more concerned I am with what I am doing, and the less creative the piece ends up being.
At the core, the process of creation is absolutely what Ernst said, "....it must be every time: invention, discovery, revelation." This is what gives me inspiration anyways, not settling for anything and always risking a lot every piece every time. Yah, I have more than a few unsuccessful pieces, but I also create lines, shapes, images and texture that really are visually exciting to me that I had to experiment to create. I guess it is that never-ending pursuit and process of discovery that attracts me so much to painting and drawing.
Discussing Wassily Kandinsky's Essay: "Concerning the Spiritual in Art"
"The life of the spirit may be fairly represented in diagram as a large acute-angled triangle divided horizontally into unequal parts with the narrowest segment uppermost. The lower the segment the greater it is in breadth, depth, and area.
The whole triangle is moving slowly, almost invisibly forwards and upwards. Where the apex was today the second segment is tomorrow; what today can be understood only by the apex and to the rest of the triangle is an incomprehensible gibberish, forms tomorrow the true thought and feeling of the second segment."
And then here is my diagram:
Kandinsky goes on to say:
"At the apex of the top segment stands often one man, and only one. His joyful vision cloaks a vast sorrow. Even those who are nearest to him in sympathy do not understand him. Angrily they abuse him as charlatan or madman. So in his lifetime stood Beethoven, solitary and insulted."
and a paragraph later....
"In every segment of the triangle are artists. Each one of them who can see beyond the limits of his segment is a prophet to those about him, and helps the advance of the obstinate whole. But those who are blind, or those who retard the movement of the triangle for baser reasons, are fully understood by their fellows and acclaimed for their genius. The greater the segment (which is the same as saying the lower it lies in the triangle) so the greater the number who understand the words of the artist. Every segment hungers consciously or, much more often, unconsciously for their corresponding spiritual food. This food is offered by the artists, and for this food the segment immediately below will tomorrow be stretching out eager hands."
You can see from diagram a. above the artists and their vision; they create spiritual growth; spiritual food as Kandinsky says for the artists on the level below them, and thus move the whole of understanding forward. You can also see in diagram b. the ones on the bottom, inhibiting the growth of knowledge and understanding.
One modern example of the latter is, (I won't name any names) but think about the work of several of those very successful commercial 'painters', (you know who I mean). The ones who create overly-cheesy, 'safe', repetitious, massively reproduced work. I too If I so desired, could paint pictures of puppy dogs and sunsets and cottages and sell them for profit.
By giving in to the temptation to create solely for money though, and not taking risks, you limit your vision and growth as an artist. And therefore impede the progress of our understanding of reality as a whole, by not fully exploring the gifts you have been given. I'm not saying success is bad of course, but I prefer risky work; ones who create out of a desire to express themselves in a new and unique way; broadening the nature of our understanding of this world.
But that's just one aspect (from my perspective) of a very broad dynamic that Kandinsky is speaking of. So, hopefully I was able to offer up a little bit of spiritual food today for you with this post. If you read this much you might as well read the whole article, (link is at the top) it is a very fascinating read.
Jackson Pollack on Creating
"When I say artist I mean the man who is building things - creating molding the earth - whether it be the plains of the west - or the iron ore of Penn. It's all a big game of construction - some with a brush - some with a shovel - some choose a pen."
-Jackson Pollack
T.S. Eliot on Creativity
"The more perfect the artist, the more completely separate in him will be the man who suffers and the mind which creates; the more perfectly will the mind digest and transmute the passions which are its material."
-T.S. Eliot, from his essay: "Tradition and Individual Talent", 1922.
Some would argue that having the time and money to do art creates a situation where masterpieces can be created, leaving the artist free from stress, worries, responsibilities, etc. But just because one may be comfortable, doesn't mean that one has to rid himself of the 'tension' in his/her life that can help with the creative process. Take for example comedian Andy Kauffman, who even when he 'hit it big', took a job at a deli-counter in an effort to keep it (his comedy) real, providing fuel for his art. In conclusion, I am not saying one needs to suffer to make good art; but it sure does make it a hell of a lot easier.
Henri Matisse On Creative Spirit
"Creative people are curious, flexible, persistent and independent with a tremendous spirit of adventure and a love of play."
- Henri Matisse (1869-1954)
I know he lived in the past and I am in his future, but I feel like Matisse was reading my personality when he wrote these words. These are aspects of my self and of some of my closest friends. I remember in my adolescence being asked one of those general icebreaker questions during a group activity - what is your favorite quality about yourself?
My answer was immediately without question, my creativity. The open, unique and independent way I view the world, the way that I interpret it and my ability to express that in my work. It's fundamental in who I was then, who I am now, and who I hope to be.
Good Art, Anxiety, and Oppression
"Anxiety is the hand maiden of creativity."
- T.S. Eliot (1888 - 1965)
In Russia, exiles from the socialist revolution like painters Marc Chagall and Wassily Kandinsky - spread their artistic influence globally. So - good art doesn't need to come from anxiety, but it sure can light a fire in an artist's soul sometimes.



